Journal for the Study of the New Testament

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for free access to the SAGE eReference platform!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sproston, W. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal for the Study of the New Testament, Vol. 15, No. 48, 43-65 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/0142064X9201504803

Witnesses to What was aacgr{pi}' aacgr{rho}{chi}eeacgr{varsigma}: 1 John's Contribution to our Knowledge of Tradition in the Fourth Gospel

Wendy E. Sproston

Department of Theology The University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX

The Fourth Evangelist is a highly original and creative interpreter of tradition. It follows that a secure means of isolating traditional material in the Gospel text can increase our chances of understanding the Evangelist's thinking. This article pro poses that 1 John can fulfil this function. An examination of the epistle text reveals that its author is a tradition bearer who seeks to reassure his community in the wake of a crisis by citing known tradition and interpreting it to meet their needs. In these respects, Gospel and epistle prove remarkably alike. The Evangelist's text also exhibits the hallmarks of the tradition bearer. Moreover, there are statements in the Gospel which correspond recognizably with the specific content of the material which 1 John identifies as original tradition. Thus, the reason why the two texts come into remarkable agreement at certain points is because the epistle writer has appealed to items in the traditon aacgr{pi}' aacgr{rho}{chi}eeacgr{varsigma} which the Evangelist, writing in another context, had also known and reproduced. On this basis, it may be assumed that where 1 John appeals to what is known, and where substantially the same material occurs in the Gospel, then at those points the Evangelist has reflected source material in his text. The article concludes with some comments on the potential value of using the epistle to identify the tradition known to the Fourth Evangelist.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?