Journal for the Study of the New Testament

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Page, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal for the Study of the New Testament, Vol. 15, No. 50, 105-120 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/0142064X9301505007
© 1993 SAGE Publications

Marital Expectations of Church Leaders in the Pastoral Epistles

Sydney Page

Edmonton Baptist Seminary 11525-23 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta T6J 4T3 Canada

The pastoral epistles state that a person aspiring to church leadership is to be µ{iota}{alpha}{varsigma} {gamma}{upsilon}{nu}{alpha}{iota}{kappa}ó{varsigma} aacgr{nu}eeacgr{rho}. The meaning of this phrase is disputed. Often it is understood to refer to the candidate's marital status. It is interpreted as excluding from leadership positions those who (1) are unmarried, (2) were polygamous, (3) had been divorced or (4) had remarried after being bereaved. None of these explanations is totally satisfactory. Preferable is the interpretation that the disputed phrase refers to the quality of being faithful to one's wife. This accords much better than the alternatives with both the immediate and broader literary contexts and with the historical context. The major objection which has been raised against this view is that it requires an unnatural interpretation of the language, but this objection is insubstantial.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?