Journal for the Study of the New Testament

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sim, D. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal for the Study of the New Testament, Vol. 15, No. 50, 3-12 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/0142064X9301505001
© 1993 SAGE Publications

The Meaning of {pi}{alpha}{lambda}{iota}{gamma}{gamma}{varepsilon}{nu}{varepsilon}{sigma}iacgr{alpha} in Matthew 19.28

David C. Sim

Division of Religious Studies, La Trobe University Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia

Some dispute surrounds the correct interpretation of {pi}{alpha}{lambda}{iota}{gamma}{gamma}{varepsilon}{nu}{varepsilon}{sigma}iacgr{alpha} in Mt. 19.28. While all scholars accept that this term possesses eschatological import, there is no agreement on its precise meaning. One school of thought argues that the term reflects the common apocalyptic belief in the re-creation of the cosmic order after its prior destruction at the eschaton. Other scholars, however, dispute this interpretation and insist that {pi}{alpha}{lambda}{iota}{gamma}{gamma}{varepsilon}{nu}{varepsilon}{sigma}iacgr{alpha} has basically temporal connotations; it refers merely to the new age which will succeed the present age. This study will defend the first interpretation by introducing to the discussion two other Matthaean passages, namely 5.18 and 24.35, whose importance in relation to this subject has not been fully appreciated.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?