Journal for the Study of the New Testament

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nolland, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal for the Study of the New Testament, Vol. 17, No. 58, 19-35 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0142064X9501705802

The Gospel Prohibition of Divorce: Tradition History and Meaning

John Nolland

Trinity College, Stoke Hill, Bristol BS9 1JP

Each of the present Gospel forms of the tradition of Jesus' words prohibiting divorce (Mt. 5.32; Mk 10.11-12; Lk. 16.18) is a natural development of a single original form which (1) lacked the exception clause (which probably arose in a Jewish Christian context where adultery was understood as causing the total destruction of a marriage, and which in any case represents a re-formulation of the moral vision of Jesus for practical implementation as a rule of life); (2) included the man's remarriage as an essential part of the action being criticized (this is where the adultery against the former wife takes place); and (3) contained a form of the second clause about marrying a divorced women which is to be understood as referring to a woman who has deliberately precipitated a divorce from her husband in order to contract a more desirable liason. This original is traced to the historical Jesus.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?