Journal for the Study of the New Testament

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Young, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal for the Study of the New Testament, Vol. 18, No. 59, 93-110 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/0142064X9601805905
© 1996 SAGE Publications

Interpretative Genres and the Inevitability of Pluralism

Frances Young

Office of the Dean, Faculty of Arts, University of Birmingham. P.O. Box 363, Birmingham B 15 2TT

The genre of interpretation affects the way biblical texts are read. A range of interpretative genres are explored: the commentary, the homily, the theme-study, the literary-critical study, the church report, the sermon, liturgy and hymnography, even systematic theology. The first, namely the commentary, is characterized by reference to its origins in the grammatical and rhetorical schools of Antiquity, and then provides a benchmark for considering the advantages and disadvantages of the various interpretative genres. Commentaries and homilies follow the sequence of the text, whereas other genres create a 'metatext' by deduction. A genre of interpretation may affect the implicit genre of the biblical text: the church report seeks 'rulings' from scripture, for example. Can exegesis deriving from one genre be expected to function in another? Perhaps we should not expect scholarship and preaching to be related as master and slave. A plurality of approaches to interpretation is surely inevitable.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?