Journal for the Study of the New Testament

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goodwin, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal for the Study of the New Testament, Vol. 18, No. 61, 65-85 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/0142064X9601806104
© 1996 SAGE Publications

The Pauline Background of the Living God as Interpretive Context for 1 Timothy 4.10

Mark J. Goodwin

Department of Theology, University of Dallas 1845 Northgate Drive, Irving, TX 75062

This article explores the meaning of 1 Tim. 4.10, with special attention paid to its use of the living God epithet which occurs in the latter part of the verse: 'for to this end we toil and strive because we have set our hope on the living God, who is the Savior of all people'. What is the particular significance of the living God in this context? In response to this question, most commentators rely on the insights of Martin Dibelius; however, little has been done to advance beyond Dibelius's insights and this is the purpose of this article. The discussion begins with an examination of the living God in its immediate literary context and is followed by a survey of the Pauline back ground of the living God, yielding the conclusion that the epithet in 1 Tim. 4.10 reflects a specific Pauline significance. Further, another issue is addreased: did the author of 1 Timothy borrow the living God from Paul's letters? Precisely what kind of Pauline background informs 1 Tim. 4.10? In response it will be argued that 1 Tim. 4.10 reflects a post-Pauline oral tradition of the living God, the kind of which is attested in the Acts of Paul.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?