Journal for the Study of the New Testament

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reed, J. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal for the Study of the New Testament, Vol. 18, No. 61, 87-99 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/0142064X9601806105
© 1996 SAGE Publications

Are Paul's Thanksgivings 'Epistolary' ?

Jeffrey T. Reed

25025 Seklahanie Blvd C203, Issaquah, WA 98029

This study responds to a recent article by P. Arzt which in sum argues that Paul's thanksgivings are not of the kind found in epistolary traditions and, thus, should not be interpreted in light of them. In response, examples from the time of Paul as well as others are used to demonstrate that Paul's thanksgivings can be informed by epistolary thanksgiving traditions, both with respect to what Paul changes (perhaps for ideological reasons) and what Paul retains. Arzt has not demonstrated, either in terms of (1) the epistolary evidence or (2) his questionable methodological assump tions regarding epistolary formulas, that epistolary thanksgivings should not be used to shed light on Paul's thanksgivings. Nonetheless, Arzt correctly points out that the term 'introductory', when used to describe Pauline thanksgivings, is sometimes misleading and inaccurate.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?