This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dunnill, J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Methodological Rivalries: Theology and Social Science in Girardian Interpretations of the New Testament

School of Social Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia

This paper examines some applications to biblical studies of Rene Girard's theory that all human culture and religion is based on the mechanism of mimetic violence. It looks particularly at recent writings by B. Chilton and R.G. Hamerton-Kelly, which employ Girardian analysis to uncover Jesus' critique of sacrifice as ritual vengeance. In both cases Girard's theory is shown to function not as a neutral heuristic tool but as a theologically weighted presupposition. The paper argues that Girard's anthropo logical theory is highly misleading as an account of sacrifice, and itself presupposes the anti-sacrificial theology it appears to generate. The theory, which is large and suggestive, needs to be criticized on both anthropological and theological grounds before being appropriated. In this instance what looks like an enriching dialogue between biblical studies and the human sciences is the subordination of exegesis and historical inquiry to a forceful but unexamined theology.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?