Journal for the Study of the New Testament

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'Neill, J.C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal for the Study of the New Testament, Vol. 19, No. 63, 87-103 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/0142064X9701906305

The Connection Between Baptism and the Gift of the Spirit in Acts

J.C. O'Neill

The University of Edinburgh, Faculty of Divinity, New College The Mound, Edinburgh EH 2LX. Scotland

Water and fire went together and were seen as both destructive and salvific in Judaism at the time of the New Testament. In Acts Spirit baptism was assumed to follow water baptism (unless it preceded it). Acts 19.5 is the exception: those bap tized by John were rebaptized. It is not an exception. Acts 19.1-7 is made up of two sources: Acts 19.1D, 3, 4, 5, 7 Paul's encounter with those baptized in the name of John the Baptist; and Acts 19.1B, 2, 6, Paul's meeting with believers in Jesus who did not know that the Spirit was widely available, on whom he laid hands so that they received the Spirit. In the first source the usual pattern is preserved if we conjec ture {epsilon with psili}{pi}í{sigma}{tau}{varepsilon}v{sigma}{alpha}{nu} for {epsilon with psili}ß{alpha}{pi}{tau}i{sigma}{theta}{eta}{sigma}{alpha}{nu} (Acts 19.5). The present text is a scribal corruption, the result of customary usage combined with an attempt to 'correct' a mistake.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?