Journal for the Study of the New Testament

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spencer, P. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal for the Study of the New Testament, Vol. 22, No. 75, 49-68 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0142064X0002207504

Narrative Echoes in John 21: Intertextual Interpretation and Intratextual Connection

Patrick E. Spencer

5405 Diana Common, Fremont, CA 94555

This article examines John 21 by means of Wayne Booth's reading strategy of 'conduction'. As a later redactional addition, ch. 21 casts a different understanding upon the preceding narrative of chs. 1-20 through the implied author's intertextual interpretation. One of the most obvious ways in which the intertextual interpretation of the implied author is manifest is in the form of narrative echoes, implicit refer ences to earlier parts of the narrative discourse in chs. 1-20. These become intratex tual connections for the implied reader, whereby the interplay between the derivations in chs. 1-20 and their intertextual interpretation in ch. 21 creates new meaning. At least four echoes are extant: (1) the Feeding of the Five Thousand and the resulting scenes surrounding it in 6.1-71; (2) Peter's Three-fold Denial in 18.15- 18, 25-27; (3) Jesus' Washing of the Disciples' Feet in 13.2-5, 36-38; and (4) the Parable of the Good Shepherd in 10.1-18. The interplay that occurs between the implied author and the implied reader prompts the authorial audience to make the following acknowledgments: (1) the Eucharist, as an embodiment of Jesus' contin ued presence, fosters belief in those who celebrate it; (2) restoration for estranged members of the ecclesiastical community occurs in the context of the Eucharist; and (3) Peter is afforded special status as a church leader and his ministry as the Good Shepherd (specifically his activity of bringing in marginalized groups [10.16]) encourages the embrace of Christian communities of differing heritages.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?