This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Crook, Z. A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Structure versus Agency in Studies of the Biblical Social World: Engaging with Louise Lawrence

Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Dr., Ottawa, Canada, zeba_crook{at}carleton.ca

Taking Louise Lawrence’s ethnographic study of the Gospel of Matthew as a starting point, this article questions whether the structure vs. agency debate in social theory can be settled by proclaiming (or presupposing) one over the other. Indeed, sociological theory has been moving towards recognizing that society, and alongside it culture, must include both. This theoretical question matters for our understanding of the New Testament world. Can we, for instance, assume a single ratio of structure to agency for the ancient and the modern worlds? I suggest that other aspects of a culture should be brought to bear on this question, namely collectivism and individualism. Surely, a collectivistic culture (the biblical world) will operate with a different degree of structure than will an individualistic culture (North America and parts of Europe).

Key Words: Structure • agency • sociology • social-scientific criticism • Gospel of Matthew • honour and shame • individualism • VOM

Journal for the Study of the New Testament, Vol. 29, No. 3, 251-275 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0142064X07076306


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?