|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Journal for the Study of the New Testament, Vol. 30, No. 2,
173-203 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0142064X07084775
© 2007 SAGE Publications
The Rhetoric of      in Paul: Galatians 2.16, 3.22, Romans 3.22, and Philippians 3.9*
R. Barry Matlock
Department of Biblical Studies, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK, r.b.matlock{at}sheffield.ac.uk
The question of      X   o in Paul (Gal. 2.16, 20; 3.22; Rom. 3.22, 26; Phil. 3.9; cf. Eph. 3.12) is impossible to avoid and has proved particularly resistant to resolution. The single most frequent exegetical argument made against the objective genitive reading (`faith in Christ') on behalf of the subjective genitive reading (`the faithfulness of Christ') is that the former creates an unacceptable redundancy in several instances, where one finds two or more      /       phrases side by side (Gal. 2.16; 3.22; Rom. 3.22; Phil. 3.9). Using this question of redundancy as a point of departure, this article offers a fresh look at these four verses, accounting for five of the seven      X   o phrases. This is not primarily a negative critique of this redundancy argument, however, but rather a positive inquiry into the inter-relation of and interaction between these      /     $slash phrases and the other elements of their respective contexts— and the role such considerations might play in their own right in disambiguating      X   o . The aim is not to offer a complete exegesis of the texts in question, but to attend specifically to matters that bear on      X   o , and more particularly to matters of rhetoric/style/structure. In this way, I will offer a number of exegetical observations that weigh heavily in favor of the objective genitive reading.
Key Words: pistis Christou objective genitive subjective genitive redundancy rhetoric structure

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
|