Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Journal for the Study of the New Testament
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crook, Z. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Structure versus Agency in Studies of the Biblical Social World: Engaging with Louise Lawrence

Zeba A. Crook

Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Dr., Ottawa, Canada, zeba_crook{at}carleton.ca

Taking Louise Lawrence’s ethnographic study of the Gospel of Matthew as a starting point, this article questions whether the structure vs. agency debate in social theory can be settled by proclaiming (or presupposing) one over the other. Indeed, sociological theory has been moving towards recognizing that society, and alongside it culture, must include both. This theoretical question matters for our understanding of the New Testament world. Can we, for instance, assume a single ratio of structure to agency for the ancient and the modern worlds? I suggest that other aspects of a culture should be brought to bear on this question, namely collectivism and individualism. Surely, a collectivistic culture (the biblical world) will operate with a different degree of structure than will an individualistic culture (North America and parts of Europe).

Key Words: Structure • agency • sociology • social-scientific criticism • Gospel of Matthew • honour and shame • individualism • VOM

References

  • Bartchy, S. Scott 2002 ‘The Historical Jesus and Honor Reversal at the Table’, in W. Stegemann, B. J. Malina and G. Theissen (eds.), The Social Setting of Jesus and the Gospels ( Minneapolis: Fortress Press ): 175-183.
  • Bell, Michael Meyerfeld, and Michael Gardiner (eds.) 1998 Bakhtin and the Human Sciences ( Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications ).
  • Berger, Bennett M. 1995 An Essay on Culture: Symbolic Structure and Social Structure ( Berkeley: University of California Press ).
  • Bourdieu, Pierre 1977 Outline of a Theory of Practice (trans. R. Nice; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Bourdieu, Originally published as Esquisse d’une théorie de la practique (Geneva: Droz, 1972). Bourdieu 1990 The Logic of Practice (trans. R. Nice; Stanford: Stanford University Press ).Bourdieu, Originally published as Sens practicque (Paris: Les editions de minuit, 1980).
  • Cairns, D. L. 1993 Aidos: The Psychology and Ethics of Honour and Shame in Ancient Greek Literature ( Oxford: Clarendon Press ).
  • Campbell, J. K. 1964 Honour, Family, and Patronage: A Study of Institutions and Moral Values in a Greek Mountain Community ( Oxford: Clarendon Press ).
  • Chance, John K. 1996 ‘The Anthropology of Honor and Shame: Culture, Values, and Practice’ , Semeia 68: 139-151 .
  • Davis, John 1987 ‘Family and State in the Mediterranean’, in Gilmore 1987: 22-34.
  • Downing, F. G. 1999 ‘"Honor" among Exegetes’ , CBQ 61: 53-73 .
  • Esler, P. F. 2000 ‘Models in New Testament Interpretation: A Reply to David Horrell’ , JSNT 78: 107-113 . Esler, P. F. 2006 ‘Social Scientific Models in Biblical Interpretation’, in Philip F. Esler (ed.), Ancient Israel: The Old Testament in its Social Context ( Minneapolis: Fortress Press ): 3-14.
  • Fisher, N. R. E. 1992 Hybris: A Study in the Values of Honour and Shame in Ancient Greece ( Warminster, UK: Aris & Phillips ).
  • Geertz, Clifford References 1975 ‘On the Nature of Anthropological Understanding’ , American Scientist 63: 47-53 .
  • Giddens, Anthony 1979 Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis ( Berkeley: University of California Press ). Giddens, Anthony 1984 The Constitution of Society: Outline of a Theory of Structuration ( Cambridge: Polity Press ).
  • Gilmore, David D. (ed.) 1987 Honor and Shame and the Unity of the Mediterranean ( Washington, DC: American Anthropological Association ).
  • Gowler, David B., L. Gregory Bloomquist and Duane F. Watson (eds.) 2003 Fabrics of Discourse: Essays in Honor of Vernon K. Robbins ( Harrisburg, PA: Trinity Press International ).
  • Green, Barbara 2000 Mikhail Bakhtin and Biblical Scholarship: An Introduction ( Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature ).
  • Giordano, Christian 2001 ‘Mediterranean Honour Reconsidered: Anthropological Fiction or Actual Action Strategy?’, in Maria Greverus, Regina Römhild and Gisela Welz (eds.), The Mediterraneans: Reworking the Past, Shaping the Present, Considering the Future (Ina-Anthropological Journal of European Cultures 10; Münster: Lit Verlag ): 39-58.
  • Herzfeld, Michael 1980 ‘Honour and Shame: Problems in the Comparative Analysis of Moral Systems’ , Man 15: 339-351 .[CrossRef] Herzfeld, Michael 1987 ‘"As in your Own House": Hospitality, Ethnography, and the Stereotype of Mediterranean Society’, in Gilmore 1987: 75-89.
  • Hofstede, Geert 2001 Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations ( Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications ).
  • Horden, Peregrine, and Nicholas Purcell 2000 The Corrupting Sea: A Study of Mediterranean History ( Oxford: Blackwell ).
  • Horrell, David G. 2000 ‘Models and Methods in Social-Scientific Interpretation: A Response to Philip Esler’ , JSNT 78: 83-105 .
  • Kressel, Gideon M. 1992 ‘Shame and Gender’ , Anthropological Quarterly 65: 34-46 .[CrossRef]
  • Kluckhohn, Florence Rockwood, and Fred L. Strodtbeck 1961 Variations in Value Orientations ( Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson and Company ).
  • Lawrence, Louise J. 2002 ‘"For truly, I tell you, they have received their reward" (Matt 6.2): Investigating Honor Precedence and Honor Virtue’ , CBQ 64: 690-702 . Lawrence, Louise J. 2003 An Ethnography of the Gospel of Matthew: A Critical Assessment of the Use of the Honour and Shame Model in New Testament Studies ( Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck ).
  • Malina, B. J. 1994 ‘"Let him Deny himself" (Mark 8.34 & par): A Social Psychological Model of Self-Denial’ , BTB 24: 106-119 . Malina, B. J. 2001 The New Testament World (3rd edn; Louisville, KY: Westminster/John Knox Press ).
  • Malina, B. J., and Jerome H. Neyrey 1996 Portraits of Paul: An Archaeology of Ancient Personality ( Louisville, KY: Westminster/John Knox Press ).
  • Mandelker, A. (ed.) 1995 Bakhtin in Contexts: Across the Disciplines ( Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press ).
  • Meeks, Wayne A. 1983 The First Urban Christians: The Social World of the Apostle Paul ( New Haven: Yale University Press ).
  • Moxnes, H. 1988 ‘Honor and Righteousness in Romans’ , JSNT 32: 61-77 .
  • Neyrey, Jerome H. 1996 ‘"Despising the Shame of the Cross": Honor and Shame in the Johannine Passion Narrative’ , Semeia 68: 113-137 . Neyrey, Jerome H. 1998 Honor and Shame in the Gospel of Matthew ( Louisville, KY: Westminster/John Knox Press ). Neyrey, Jerome H. 2001 ‘Prayer, in Other Words: New Testament Prayer in Social Scientific Perspective’, in J. J. Pilch (ed.), Social Scientific Models for Interpreting the Bible: Essays by the Context Group in Honor of Bruce J. Malina ( Leiden: E.J. Brill ): 349-380.
  • Niles, F. Sushilla 1998 ‘Individualism-Collectivism Revisted’ , Cross Cultural Research 32: 315-341 .
  • Ortner, Sherry B. 2005 ‘Subjectivity and Cultural Critique’ , Anthropological Theory 5: 31-52 .[Abstract]
  • Peristiany, J. G. (ed.) 1966 Honour and Shame: The Values of Mediterranean Society ( London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson ).
  • Peristiany, J. G., and J. A. Pitt-Rivers (eds.) 1992 Honor and Grace in Anthropology ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ).
  • Pilch, John J. 1991 Introducing the Culture of the New Testament (Hear the Word!, 2; New York: Paulist Press ).
  • Robinson, J. M., P. Hoffman and J. S. Kloppenborg (eds.) 2000 The Critical Edition of Q ( Minneapolis: Fortress Press ).
  • Rohrbaugh, Richard L. 2002 ‘Ethnocentrism and the Historical Questions about Jesus’, in Wolfgang Stegeman, Bruce J. Malina and Gerd Theissen (eds.), The Social Setting of Jesus and the Gospels ( Minneapolis: Fortress Press , 2002), 27-43.
  • Sahlins, Marshall 2000/1982 ‘Individual Experience and Cultural Order’, in M. Sahlins (ed.), Culture in Practice: Selected Essays ( New York: Zone Books ): 277-292. Sahlins, Marshall 2004 Apologies to Thucydides: Understanding History as Culture and Vice Versa ( Chicago: University of Chicago Press ). Sahlins, Marshall 2005 ‘Structural Work’ , Anthropological Theory 5: 5-30 .[Abstract]
  • Schneider, J. 1971 ‘Of Vigilance and Virgins: Honor, Shame and Access to Resources in Mediterranean Societies’ , Ethnology 10: 1-24 .[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Shweder, Richard A., and Edmund J. Bourne 1991 ‘Does the Concept of the Person Vary Cross-Culturally?’, in Richard A. Shweder, Thinking through Cultures: Expeditions in Cultural Psychology ( Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press ): 113-155.
  • Swidler, Ann 1986 ‘Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies’ , American Sociological Review 51: 273-286 .[CrossRef]
  • Triandis, Harry C. 1995 Individualism and Collectivism ( Boulder, CO: Westview Press ). Triandis, Harry C. 2001 ‘Individualism and Collectivism’, in David Matsumoto (ed.), The Handbook of Culture and Psychology ( Oxford: Oxford University Press ), 35-50.
  • Triandis, Harry C., K. Leung, M. Villareal and F. L. Clack 1985 ‘Allocentric versus Idiocentric Tendencies: Convergent and Discriminant Validation’ , Journal of Research in Personality 19: 395-415 .[CrossRef]

Journal for the Study of the New Testament, Vol. 29, No. 3, 251-275 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0142064X07076306


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crook, Z. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?